Updated yesterday
PurplePrint’s shared-project policy separates progress visibility from document editing

PurplePrint’s shared-project policy separates progress visibility from document editing

PurplePrint’s October 28 policy covers collaborator roles and progress data. Document editing stays with the creator or an assigned member; shared links work differently.

The new terms cover project membership and progress

PurplePrint’s privacy‑policy notice, announced October 27 and effective October 28 at 00:00 KST, sets out how the AI design‑coaching service handles shared projects. It describes a project creator inviting another person who has previously logged in to PurplePrint.

The member information includes an account, role, chosen short display name, who invited the person and the invitation and joining times. The policy also lists a member’s next action and the names of assigned artifacts. For collaborators, the distinction is between the information needed to coordinate a project and permission to change its design documents.

Seeing progress does not give every member editing rights

Under [Section 4](https://purpleprint‑ai.com/en/privacy/), invited members can see the project’s phase, artifact names, next action and recent changes. Design documents, however, can be edited only by the creator or a member the creator assigns. Membership and document‑editing authority are therefore separate in the provider’s stated rules. The creator can remove members, and members can leave themselves. PurplePrint says it sends no invitation emails and does not store the email address of someone who has not signed up. These are the company’s descriptions of the service; OpenTools has not tested invitations or permission enforcement.

A shared link is a separate way to expose project content

The same [policy](https://purpleprint‑ai.com/en/privacy/) distinguishes membership from shared links. Someone with a link can view project documents and review results without logging in, along with conversations if the person creating the link includes them. The link creator chooses an expiry and can stop the link. That makes the sharing surface important when deciding what to disclose. An invited‑member role is not the same as a link that permits viewing without an account. The policy says links are kept out of search engines; that statement is not a promise that a recipient cannot pass a working link to someone else.

The policy describes retention, not a universal rollout test

[Section 3](https://purpleprint‑ai.com/en/privacy/) says member information is kept while the project exists. After someone leaves or is removed, a participation record without content remains. The policy separately says deleting a web‑coach project immediately removes its conversations and design documents and stops its share links, while content‑free progress and usage information remains. The dated change establishes PurplePrint’s stated processing terms. It does not, by itself, establish that shared projects are enabled for every account or independently verify access controls, deletion behavior or regulatory compliance. Conceptual illustration created for OpenTools: a folder, a magnifying lens and a pencil represent the distinction between viewing project information and editing documents. It is not a PurplePrint interface, permission diagram or demonstration of privacy enforcement.

Share this article

PostShare

Related News