PurplePrint’s shared-project policy separates progress visibility from document editing
PurplePrint’s October 28 policy covers collaborator roles and progress data. Document editing stays with the creator or an assigned member; shared links work differently.
The new terms cover project membership and progress
PurplePrint’s privacy‑policy notice, announced October 27 and effective October 28 at 00:00 KST, sets out how the AI design‑coaching service handles shared projects. It describes a project creator inviting another person who has previously logged in to PurplePrint.
The member information includes an account, role, chosen short display name, who invited the person and the invitation and joining times. The policy also lists a member’s next action and the names of assigned artifacts. For collaborators, the distinction is between the information needed to coordinate a project and permission to change its design documents.
Seeing progress does not give every member editing rights
A shared link is a separate way to expose project content
The policy describes retention, not a universal rollout test
Related News
Oct 29, 2026
Canada’s privacy regulators separate health-AI responsibilities for builders, buyers and researchers
An October 29 call sets out different governance tasks for health-AI developers, procurers and researchers. The underlying resolution was adopted September 15; the call is not a new national law.
Oct 28, 2026
Opera’s local-AI preview is opt-in, with hardware and site-permission limits
Opera One’s local-AI preview supports selected Windows PCs and Apple-silicon Macs. Model downloads are opt-in, and website access has a separate permission boundary.
Oct 27, 2026
Noyb files five privacy complaints over Scale AI’s Outlier worker data
The complaints in four European countries challenge tracking, biometric verification and access requests on Outlier. Scale’s existing privacy policy describes identity checks as fraud prevention; the filings are not a regulatory ruling.