Audioshake vs CoGrader
Side-by-side comparison · Updated October 2026
| Description | AudioShake separates an existing recording into sources such as vocals, instruments, dialogue, music and effects. It also offers speech cleanup, speaker separation, lyric transcription and word-level lyric alignment. Use those outputs in editing, dubbing, remixing or audio analysis, and listen for leakage and changed sounds before delivery. Its lyric transcription is not a general-purpose speech-to-text service; separated speech can instead feed a dedicated transcription workflow. The developer API includes 10 credits on signup. Usage is billed per source-audio minute for each target model, rounding the duration up to the next minute. A 2 minute 10 second recording processed by vocals and instrumental models at one credit per minute each costs six credits. Instrument stems and lyric transcription/alignment cost one credit per minute; dialogue, effects and speech denoise cost 1.5, dereverb two, multi-voice and music removal ten, and music detection 0.5. Credit rates are not dollar prices. Dereverb also reduces noise, so avoid automatically paying for both cleanup models when one meets the task. Choose AudioShake Live for its professional web workflow, Indie for its artist-oriented route, the API for asynchronous jobs and batches, or a separately licensed Local Inference SDK for on-device or self-hosted integration. Check the target model's input limits: multi-voice accepts at most 1.5 hours, while lyric transcription and alignment accept at most 45 minutes. Pilot the required source material and integration before committing to a production pipeline. AudioShake's August 2026 terms identify Audioshake, Inc. Customers retain content ownership and must have the rights to upload and process it. The agreement permits service improvement and development uses of content, while promising not to sell it or use it to train models designed to generate new original musical compositions or sound recordings. That is a narrower promise than a ban on all model training. Confirm the applicable Order Form for third-party or service-bureau integrations and agree retention requirements for confidential audio. | CoGrader is a teacher-facing AI grading assistant for essays and other open-ended assignments. It uses a selected or custom rubric to draft grades and feedback that educators can review and edit before returning work. Its useful role is helping a teacher organize assessment and feedback; it does not establish that a grade is correct, unbiased or suitable for a particular student without human review. The free Starter plan includes 100 student submissions per month and rubric creation and sharing. The pricing page also advertises 90 days of premium access, which is a temporary benefit rather than unlimited free access to paid features. Standard includes 350 submissions per month, handwritten assignments, grammar checking and a class-performance dashboard. It costs $19 per month on monthly billing or an advertised $15 per month billed annually. The annual equivalent is $180 before any applicable additions, calculated as $15 multiplied by 12; confirm the actual checkout total before paying. Schools and Districts plans use a custom quote and advertise unlimited submissions, shared rubric libraries, administration, institutional analytics and training. Higher Ed and Enterprise also use a custom quote, with API access, custom LMS connections and roles among the listed options. Choose a plan around submission volume, the review process and the integrations your institution actually needs, rather than assuming an individual subscription includes enterprise access. To evaluate CoGrader, begin with a rubric that defines each criterion and the evidence needed for each score. Try a small, permitted sample of work you have already assessed, compare the suggested results with your own reasoning, and revise unclear rubric language. Check whether each comment refers accurately to the student's work and gives an actionable next step. Review accommodations, language-learning needs and subject-specific expectations before finalizing feedback. A class dashboard can help identify topics to revisit; it should not replace the teacher's judgment about individual learning needs. Google Classroom integration is described as available to all users. The pricing FAQ places full Canvas and Schoology integration in school or district subscriptions, although the plan cards also display those platforms elsewhere. Confirm the exact integration and account entitlement you need. Other LMS workflows may use file import and export. The vendor also advertises plagiarism and AI-writing detection, but its plan card and FAQ disagree about AI-detection access. Confirm the selected plan's access, and treat a flag as a reason to review the evidence rather than proof of misconduct. CoGrader's privacy policy says teachers provide assignment questions, rubrics and student answers, and that student grading data is not used to train its AI models. It says third-party AI providers may not train on that data and identifies OpenAI OpCo, LLC as a provider receiving anonymized grading information. The policy also allows anonymized aggregate information to improve the service and does not give one fixed deletion deadline. Follow your school's authorization and data-handling process before uploading student work; a vendor policy is a statement of practice, not an independent security assessment. CoGrader is most relevant when an educator needs rubric-based feedback at a recurring classroom workload. Compare EssayGrader using the same sample rubric, feedback-review steps, submission allowance and data requirements. The terms describe a refund window within 14 days of an initial subscription purchase; that is separate from the free plan's advertised premium-access period. Review billing and cancellation terms before subscribing. |
| Category | Audio Editing | Education |
| Rating | No reviews | No reviews |
| Pricing | Usage-Based | Freemium |
| Starting Price | N/A | Free |
| Plans | — |
|
| Use Cases |
|
|
| Tags | audio source separationmusic stem separationdialogue separationlyric alignmentaudio API | AI essay gradingrubric feedbackteacher assessmentGoogle Classroomeducation |
| Features | ||
| Music and instrument stem separation | ||
| Dialogue, music and effects separation | ||
| Speech denoise and combined dereverb/denoise | ||
| Multi-speaker separation | ||
| Lyric transcription and word-level alignment | ||
| Asynchronous API jobs, webhooks and batches | ||
| Separate Live, Indie and Local Inference SDK access | ||
| Rubric-based AI grades and feedback for teacher review | ||
| Free Starter: 100 student submissions per month | ||
| Standard: 350 submissions per month | ||
| Custom and standards-aligned rubrics | ||
| Handwritten assignments and grammar checking on Standard | ||
| Google Classroom integration and institutional LMS options | ||
| Class-performance dashboard and institutional analytics | ||
| Quoted API access for Higher Ed and Enterprise | ||
| View Audioshake | View CoGrader | |
Modify This Comparison
Also Compare
Explore more head-to-head comparisons with Audioshake and CoGrader.