Audioshake vs FileGPT
Side-by-side comparison · Updated September 2026
| Description | AudioShake separates an existing recording into sources such as vocals, instruments, dialogue, music and effects. It also offers speech cleanup, speaker separation, lyric transcription and word-level lyric alignment. Use those outputs in editing, dubbing, remixing or audio analysis, and listen for leakage and changed sounds before delivery. Its lyric transcription is not a general-purpose speech-to-text service; separated speech can instead feed a dedicated transcription workflow. The developer API includes 10 credits on signup. Usage is billed per source-audio minute for each target model, rounding the duration up to the next minute. A 2 minute 10 second recording processed by vocals and instrumental models at one credit per minute each costs six credits. Instrument stems and lyric transcription/alignment cost one credit per minute; dialogue, effects and speech denoise cost 1.5, dereverb two, multi-voice and music removal ten, and music detection 0.5. Credit rates are not dollar prices. Dereverb also reduces noise, so avoid automatically paying for both cleanup models when one meets the task. Choose AudioShake Live for its professional web workflow, Indie for its artist-oriented route, the API for asynchronous jobs and batches, or a separately licensed Local Inference SDK for on-device or self-hosted integration. Check the target model's input limits: multi-voice accepts at most 1.5 hours, while lyric transcription and alignment accept at most 45 minutes. Pilot the required source material and integration before committing to a production pipeline. AudioShake's August 2026 terms identify Audioshake, Inc. Customers retain content ownership and must have the rights to upload and process it. The agreement permits service improvement and development uses of content, while promising not to sell it or use it to train models designed to generate new original musical compositions or sound recordings. That is a narrower promise than a ban on all model training. Confirm the applicable Order Form for third-party or service-bureau integrations and agree retention requirements for confidential audio. | FileGPT is an advanced AI-powered application designed to transform the way you interact with various file formats such as PDFs, DOCs, TXTs, audio, video, YouTube, and webpages. By utilizing cutting-edge natural language processing technology, FileGPT allows users to effortlessly chat with and query their files, extracting meaningful information quickly and accurately. The platform supports long texts, smart content parsing, cross-source querying, and provides an affordable solution for individuals and businesses alike. Users can try it for free with the option to upgrade for enhanced features. |
| Category | Audio Editing | Conversational AI |
| Rating | No reviews | No reviews |
| Pricing | Usage-Based | Paid |
| Starting Price | N/A | $100/yr |
| Plans | — |
|
| Use Cases |
|
|
| Tags | audio source separationmusic stem separationdialogue separationlyric alignmentaudio API | file formatsPDFDOCTXTaudio |
| Features | ||
| Music and instrument stem separation | ||
| Dialogue, music and effects separation | ||
| Speech denoise and combined dereverb/denoise | ||
| Multi-speaker separation | ||
| Lyric transcription and word-level alignment | ||
| Asynchronous API jobs, webhooks and batches | ||
| Separate Live, Indie and Local Inference SDK access | ||
| Multi-format support for PDFs, TXTs, DOCs, audio, video, YouTube, and webpages | ||
| Natural language processing for querying and interacting with files | ||
| Support for long texts and large file sizes | ||
| Smart content parsing for handwritten texts and multimedia | ||
| Cross-source querying to integrate multiple files into a single answer | ||
| Affordable pricing plans with the option to upgrade | ||
| Mobile-optimized for better user experience on small screens | ||
| Enhanced customer support with higher-tier plans | ||
| Embedding capabilities for websites | ||
| Token-based pricing model for flexibility in usage | ||
| View Audioshake | View FileGPT | |
Modify This Comparison
Also Compare
Explore more head-to-head comparisons with Audioshake and FileGPT.