CoGrader vs Recraft
Side-by-side comparison · Updated October 2026
| Description | CoGrader is a teacher-facing AI grading assistant for essays and other open-ended assignments. It uses a selected or custom rubric to draft grades and feedback that educators can review and edit before returning work. Its useful role is helping a teacher organize assessment and feedback; it does not establish that a grade is correct, unbiased or suitable for a particular student without human review. The free Starter plan includes 100 student submissions per month and rubric creation and sharing. The pricing page also advertises 90 days of premium access, which is a temporary benefit rather than unlimited free access to paid features. Standard includes 350 submissions per month, handwritten assignments, grammar checking and a class-performance dashboard. It costs $19 per month on monthly billing or an advertised $15 per month billed annually. The annual equivalent is $180 before any applicable additions, calculated as $15 multiplied by 12; confirm the actual checkout total before paying. Schools and Districts plans use a custom quote and advertise unlimited submissions, shared rubric libraries, administration, institutional analytics and training. Higher Ed and Enterprise also use a custom quote, with API access, custom LMS connections and roles among the listed options. Choose a plan around submission volume, the review process and the integrations your institution actually needs, rather than assuming an individual subscription includes enterprise access. To evaluate CoGrader, begin with a rubric that defines each criterion and the evidence needed for each score. Try a small, permitted sample of work you have already assessed, compare the suggested results with your own reasoning, and revise unclear rubric language. Check whether each comment refers accurately to the student's work and gives an actionable next step. Review accommodations, language-learning needs and subject-specific expectations before finalizing feedback. A class dashboard can help identify topics to revisit; it should not replace the teacher's judgment about individual learning needs. Google Classroom integration is described as available to all users. The pricing FAQ places full Canvas and Schoology integration in school or district subscriptions, although the plan cards also display those platforms elsewhere. Confirm the exact integration and account entitlement you need. Other LMS workflows may use file import and export. The vendor also advertises plagiarism and AI-writing detection, but its plan card and FAQ disagree about AI-detection access. Confirm the selected plan's access, and treat a flag as a reason to review the evidence rather than proof of misconduct. CoGrader's privacy policy says teachers provide assignment questions, rubrics and student answers, and that student grading data is not used to train its AI models. It says third-party AI providers may not train on that data and identifies OpenAI OpCo, LLC as a provider receiving anonymized grading information. The policy also allows anonymized aggregate information to improve the service and does not give one fixed deletion deadline. Follow your school's authorization and data-handling process before uploading student work; a vendor policy is a statement of practice, not an independent security assessment. CoGrader is most relevant when an educator needs rubric-based feedback at a recurring classroom workload. Compare EssayGrader using the same sample rubric, feedback-review steps, submission allowance and data requirements. The terms describe a refund window within 14 days of an initial subscription purchase; that is separate from the free plan's advertised premium-access period. Review billing and cancellation terms before subscribing. | Recraft is a browser workspace for generating images, editing existing visuals and working with raster or vector graphics. It combines a canvas, style controls and a selection of image models. Start with the kind of change you need: a new composition from a reference, a local correction, a background adjustment or a scalable graphic for a layout. For natural-language reference editing, select an image on the canvas and choose Edit image, or attach a reference in Create and describe the change. The current documentation ties reference support to selected external models, which are included on paid plans. Model limits vary, so inspect the picker before combining several references. Treat consistent subjects and legible text as things to check in the output, not guaranteed results. The live Free plan lists three generations per style per day, three daily uploads and up to two images per generation. It includes basic editing and Recraft models only. Free outputs are public, owned by Recraft and restricted to personal use. The photo-editor marketing page separately advertises up to 30 generations and edits daily; that figure should not replace the specific plan and model limits. Basic costs $12 monthly or $120 billed annually and includes 1,000 credits each month. Pro starts at $20 monthly or $192 annually for 2,000 monthly credits. Teams starts at $22 per seat monthly for 2,000 credits per seat. Prices exclude VAT. Paid plans provide private generations and stated ownership and commercial rights for images made while subscribed. Subscription credits reset each billing cycle; unused subscription credits do not roll over. API units are purchased separately. Private generation describes gallery visibility. The current Terms permit training on inputs and assets by default and provide an account-profile opt-out. Review that preference before uploading confidential work. Keep an authorized original, compare it with the edited result and check the export at the intended size. For scalable artwork, use the vector workflow and verify that the delivered file contains the paths you need; a file extension alone does not establish print readiness. |
| Category | Education | Image Generation |
| Rating | No reviews | No reviews |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Starting Price | Free | Free |
| Plans |
|
|
| Use Cases |
|
|
| Tags | AI essay gradingrubric feedbackteacher assessmentGoogle Classroomeducation | image-to-imageimage editingreference imagesinpaintingoutpainting |
| Features | ||
| Rubric-based AI grades and feedback for teacher review | ||
| Free Starter: 100 student submissions per month | ||
| Standard: 350 submissions per month | ||
| Custom and standards-aligned rubrics | ||
| Handwritten assignments and grammar checking on Standard | ||
| Google Classroom integration and institutional LMS options | ||
| Class-performance dashboard and institutional analytics | ||
| Quoted API access for Higher Ed and Enterprise | ||
| Canvas image editing | ||
| Paid natural-language reference edits | ||
| Raster and vector generation | ||
| Reusable styles | ||
| Image upscaling | ||
| Background removal | ||
| Image vectorization | ||
| Separate image API | ||
| View CoGrader | View Recraft | |
Modify This Comparison
Also Compare
Explore more head-to-head comparisons with CoGrader and Recraft.